Values

Meanings and Values

**CLASSIFICATION**
R	P	M	1

**JURISDICTION**
soil	Land	Sea	AIR

SOURCE:

Rayson and Friends

How the wisdom coding system works.

WISDOM CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM

Type of wisdom (purple box)

E = Evolutionary wisdom
R = Revealed wisdom
H = Hybrid wisdom (evolutionary + revealed mix)

Target audience (green box)

P = Personal
G = Group (non-personal)

Type of content (yellow box)

C = Curated content (paraphrased, re-written, enhanced, translated, etc.)
O = Original unedited content from external source (direct excerpts, complete content, etc.)
M = Mix of both curated and original content.

Reliability factor of content (blue box)

1 = High
2 = Average
3 = Low
X = Cannot be determined.

APPLICABLE JURISDICTION(S)

[ ] soil [ ] Land [ ] Sea [ ] AIR

Check boxes indicate to which planetary jurisdiction the contents of the page is applicable.
Can apply to one or more jurisdictions simultaneously.
All the applicable jurisdictions will have a check mark.
For additional information about the scope of these jurisdictions please refer to this chart.
For additional information about the properties of these jurisdictions please refer to this chart.

SOURCE: This row is used for recording useful information about the source of the wisdom entry. In most cases a hyperlink to the source document may suffice, but additional information may also be recorded in this row such as author, document name, ISBN # etc.

Question: In reading through The Urantia Book on meanings and values, I find that meanings and values
are generally associated with things, and that a rough projection of the universe would be that the universe consists of things, meanings and values. I know what things are. I went to the dictionary to learn what meanings are, and it defined the noun “meaning” as “that which is intended or signified,” with the synonyms to be found under the word “purpose”. I also looked into the dictionary for “values” and it defines values as the order of importance or the sequence of things. The Urantia Book says one can add values to meanings as well. Can you comment on my understanding of “things” as being objects, whether they are spiritual, physical, or morontial; as “meanings” being the significance or purpose of these objects; and “values” being the relative degree of importance of either things or meanings. Could you comment on that?

Answer:

Things are material, supermaterial, are objects, are receptacles, are systems, are patterns, and are matrixes.
Meanings are the use of these matrixes.
Values are how these meanings relate to the will of God.

Question: Can there be any “value” by itself, without evaluating a thing or a meaning - just a value?

Answer: Pure value?

Student: Yes. In other words, can you take a six and not relate it to a four and a five and a seven and an eight?

Answer: Not in that context because if you cannot relate it to the others then it will not be of that value. Values can be relative but supreme values can be existential when matrixes, meanings, and values are
all in a realm of non-space, non-time, then values can be pure and by itself. But this has no meaning when explained in this linear fashion. It is beyond your comprehension as of now.

Question: Is it correct to think of relationships as things, that these relationships are not only things but they have a meaning, and that their meaning is extremely high on the scale of values?

Rayson: Relationships?

Student: Interpersonal relationships.

Answer: Personal relationships are very high, of very high value, yes.